« WikiLeaks: Hostile is as hostile does | Main | Chaffetz: Feds Were Watching Imran Awan's Information Flow Overseas Before Arrest »

DNC LAWSUIT: Judge Z and the Hippocratic oath

by Alicia Hope

The use of statistical sampling and extrapolation has been used for years! The Judge can't honestly say that because the number of plaintiffs were relatively small that it means a lot of DNC donors were not affected.

Government routinely supports statistical sampling and extrapolation to prove liability when individualized proof of multiple claims would be too burdensome and impractical. Sampling is nothing new or unusual. For thousands of years, people have been basing judgments about a large group of objects on their observations of a few of them.

The judge knows this information. He no doubt feared for his life and the lives of his family members. This case was a big deal!! This case would have DESTROYED the DNC!!!

Judge Z said there was no concrete injury!

The usurpation of our democracy is a concrete injury if ever there was one!

Judge Z dismissed the suit knowing full well that there was a concrete injury!! It wasn't even a pending injury! It was an injury that was readily evident! The wounds are still open and bleeding! This case would have at least dressed the wounds so they could heal!!

What happens when you don't dress a wound? It gets infected and the infection grows and grows until it kills the host or at least debilitates the host!

Untreated bacterial infections tend to get worse. Some bacterial infections that are left untreated can cause serious illness and even death, even those that are not usually considered serious.

That's the next step! That's where we are as a country. We're infected and Judge Z was the doctor that had a cure or at least a treatment!

The judge's argument

“Not one of them alleges that they ever read the DNC’s charter or heard the statements they now claim are false before making their donations,” Zloch wrote. “And not one of them alleges that they took action in reliance on the DNC’s charter or the statements identified in the First Amended Complaint. Absent such allegations, these Plaintiffs lack standing.”

Let's say you go in for a treatment and the doctor disfigures you or even kills you because of his or her unusual, unapproved medical technique... is it fair to say that because you as a patient didn't read the Hippocratic oath that you can't sue in court? That would be ludicrous! There is an inherent expectation that the doctor will abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.

It doesn't matter whether the plaintiff's read the DNC charter!

Article 5, Section 4 of the DNC Charter requires that the Chairperson and all officers be impartial and evenhanded with Democratic candidates for President.

Judge Z's argument is laughable and that's what is so sad! They think we're idiots!

When the plaintiff's gave their hard earned money to the Sanders campaign, they thought he had a legitimate and fair chance to get the nomination!

Jared Beck said,"This country has a vicious, corrupt core." He's right. People will continue to wake up in time as the elite continue to shaft the people. The more they stick it to us, the more we will awaken!

That's the good news!

Buckle up. It's going to be one hell of a ride from this point forward!

Call it a hunch!!!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>